INNOVATION DRIVEN PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish) Sin título (Spanish)
Published: 2015-07-29

Main Article Content

Yaima Díaz
Deusto Business School
Maribel Guerrero
Deusto Business School
Iñaki Peña
Deusto Business School

Abstract

In this paper, we study the effect of corporate entrepreneurship on innovation productivity of spin-off firms. Results show that spin-off firms, supported by parent firms, with superior absorptive capacity and entrepreneurial orientation are more likely to yield a higher productivity derived from innovation

Article Details

Issue

No. 47 (2015): Third Quarter

Section

Management and Business Strategy

How to Cite

INNOVATION DRIVEN PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP. (2015). UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), 47. https://journals.ucjc.edu/ubr/article/view/1511

References

Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The Complementary Effects of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Profitability in Small Businesses*. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443–464.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.

Díaz, Y., Guerrero, M. & Peña, I. (2014). El papel del tipo de emprendimiento en la creación de valor a través de la innovación. Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, 24, (1-2), 59-74.

Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36(2), 173–187.

González-Pernía, J.L., Navarro, M. & Peña, I. (2010). Internacionalización de empresas jóvenes innovadoras en España. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 19, (2), 61-82.

Guerrero, M., & Peña, I. (2013). The effect of intrapreneurial experience on corporate venturing: Evidence from developed economies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 397–416.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.

Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological

opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25(10), 1141–1157.

Parra-Requena, G., Ruiz-Ortega, M.J., y Garcia-Villaverde P.M. (2013). Social Capital and Effective Innovation in Industrial Districts: Dual Effect of Absorptive Capacity. Industry and Innovation, 20 (2): 157-179.

Parker, S. C. (2011). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 19–34.

Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.

Sciascia, S., D’Oria, L., Bruni, M., & Larrañeta, B. (2014). Entrepreneurial Orientation in low- and medium-tech industries: The need for Absorptive Capacity to increase performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 761–769.

Vendrell, F., González-Pernía, J.L. y Peña, I. (2014). Do incentives matter to promote high technology-driven entrepreneurial activity? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 10, (1), 43-66.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.