¿CÓMO MEJORAR LA EXPANSIÓN INTERREGIONAL DE LAS MULTINACIONALES? EL CASO DE LAS FILIALES TRAMPOLÍN PARA LATINOAMÉRICA
Main Article Content
Resumen
El artículo analiza un modelo de expansión interregional utilizando filiales springboard. Desde su localización en España estas filiales facilitan la expansión de las empresas multinacionales en Latinoamérica, en la medida en que proporcionan parte del conocimiento experimental necesario para abordar dicha región sin la necesidad inicial de invertir en ésta. A partir del análisis de la estrategia de expansión en la región de cinco empresas multinacionales europeas proponemos un modelo inductivo, en el que las funciones de la casa matriz – procesos de coordinación y creación de conocimiento- se distribuyen entre la casa matriz y la filial springboard dependiendo del proceso de acumulación de capacidades a lo largo del tiempo. Este modelo determina el grado de compromiso que debe tener cada actor en cada una de las etapas: en una primera fase la filial springboard y la casa matriz actúan como sustitutos, sin embargo a medida que se desarrolla la red local ejecutarán funciones complementarias. En este sentido, la filial springboard ayuda a alinear el control con el contexto, por lo que este modelo aporta una herramienta de referencia estratégica para evitar la destrucción de valor por parte de las casas matrices.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Article Details
Cómo citar
Villar, C., Pla-Barber, J., Silva Domingo, L., & Madhok, A. (2017). ¿CÓMO MEJORAR LA EXPANSIÓN INTERREGIONAL DE LAS MULTINACIONALES? EL CASO DE LAS FILIALES TRAMPOLÍN PARA LATINOAMÉRICA. UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), (53). https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N1.05
Sección
Internacionalización de la Empresa
Citas
Achcaoucaou, F., Miravitlles, P., and León-Darder, F. (2014). “Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness”. International Business Review, Vol. 23, núm. 1, p. 76-90.
Alfoldi, E. A., Clegg, L. J., and McGaughey, S.L. (2012). “Coordination at the edge of the empire: The delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates”. Journal of International Management, Vol. 18, núm. 3, p.276-292.
Ambos, B., and Reitsperger, W. D. (2004). “Offshore centers of excellence: Social control and success” Management and International Review, p. 51-65.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2002). “The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, núm. 11, p. 979-996.
Birkinshaw, J. (1997). “Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, núm. 3, p. 207-229.
Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., and Ambos, T. C. (2007). “Managing executive attention in the global company”. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 48, núm. 4, p. 39.
Brenner, B., and Ambos, B. (2013). “A question of legitimacy? A dynamic perspective on multinational firm control”. Organization Science, Vol. 24, núm. 3, p.773-795.
Campbell, A. and Szulanski, G. (2016.) “Knowing when corporate headquarters adds rather than subtracts value”. McKinsey Quarterly, January, p.1-8.
Campbell, A., Goold, M., and Alexander, M. 1995. Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, núm. 2, p. 120-132.
Desai, M. A. (2009): “The Decentering of the Global Firm”. The World Economy, Vol. 32, núm. 9, p. 1271-1290.
Forsgren, M., Holm, U., and Johanson, J. (2005). Managing the embedded multinational: A business network view. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gibbert, M and Ruigrok, W. (2010). “The “What” and “How” of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work”. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 13, núm.4, p. 710-737.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology”. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 16, núm.1, 15-31.
Goold, M., Campbell, A., and Alexander, M. (1998). “Corporate strategy and parenting theory”. Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, núm. 2, p. 308-314.
Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1991) “Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations”. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, núm. 4, p. 768-792.
Harzing, A. W., and Noorderhaven, N. (2006). “Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles”. International Business Review, Vol. 15, núm.3, p. 195-214.
Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, núm. 1, p. 23-32.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. E. (2009). “The Uppsala Internationalisation Process Model Revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, núm. 9, p. 1411-1431.
Lasserre, P. (1996) “Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets”. Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, p. 30-37.
Luo, Y., and Tung, R. L. (2007). “International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, núm.4, p. 481-498.
Mc Kinsey (2011) “Governance since the economic crisis: McKinsey Global Survey results”. Ed. McKinsey.
Pla-Barber, J., and Camps, J. (2012). “Springboarding: a new geographical landscape for European foreign investment in Latin America.” Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 12, núm. 2, p. 519-538.
Pla-Barber, J., Villar, C., and Dasí, À. (2014). “La filial trampolín. Una innovación en la empresa multinacional”. Economía Industrial. 391, p. 105-114.
Prahalad, C. K. and Bhattacharyya, H. (2008): “Twenty hubs and no HQ”. Strategy + Business, 50, p. 1-5.
Rugman, A and Verbeke, A. (2008). “A regional solution to the strategy and structure of multinationals”. European Management Journal, Vol. 26, núm. 5, p. 305-313.
White, R. E., and Poynter, T. A. (1984). “Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada”. Business Quarterly, Vol. 49, núm. 2, p. 59-69.
Yin, R. (1981). “The case study crisis: Some answers”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, núm. 1, p. 58-65.
Young, S., and Tavares, A. T. (2004). “Centralization and autonomy: back to the future”. International Business Review, Vol. 13, núm. 2, p. 215-237.
Alfoldi, E. A., Clegg, L. J., and McGaughey, S.L. (2012). “Coordination at the edge of the empire: The delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates”. Journal of International Management, Vol. 18, núm. 3, p.276-292.
Ambos, B., and Reitsperger, W. D. (2004). “Offshore centers of excellence: Social control and success” Management and International Review, p. 51-65.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2002). “The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, núm. 11, p. 979-996.
Birkinshaw, J. (1997). “Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, núm. 3, p. 207-229.
Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., and Ambos, T. C. (2007). “Managing executive attention in the global company”. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 48, núm. 4, p. 39.
Brenner, B., and Ambos, B. (2013). “A question of legitimacy? A dynamic perspective on multinational firm control”. Organization Science, Vol. 24, núm. 3, p.773-795.
Campbell, A. and Szulanski, G. (2016.) “Knowing when corporate headquarters adds rather than subtracts value”. McKinsey Quarterly, January, p.1-8.
Campbell, A., Goold, M., and Alexander, M. 1995. Corporate strategy: the quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, núm. 2, p. 120-132.
Desai, M. A. (2009): “The Decentering of the Global Firm”. The World Economy, Vol. 32, núm. 9, p. 1271-1290.
Forsgren, M., Holm, U., and Johanson, J. (2005). Managing the embedded multinational: A business network view. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gibbert, M and Ruigrok, W. (2010). “The “What” and “How” of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work”. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 13, núm.4, p. 710-737.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology”. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 16, núm.1, 15-31.
Goold, M., Campbell, A., and Alexander, M. (1998). “Corporate strategy and parenting theory”. Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, núm. 2, p. 308-314.
Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1991) “Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations”. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, núm. 4, p. 768-792.
Harzing, A. W., and Noorderhaven, N. (2006). “Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles”. International Business Review, Vol. 15, núm.3, p. 195-214.
Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, núm. 1, p. 23-32.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. E. (2009). “The Uppsala Internationalisation Process Model Revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, núm. 9, p. 1411-1431.
Lasserre, P. (1996) “Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets”. Long Range Planning, Vol. 29, p. 30-37.
Luo, Y., and Tung, R. L. (2007). “International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, núm.4, p. 481-498.
Mc Kinsey (2011) “Governance since the economic crisis: McKinsey Global Survey results”. Ed. McKinsey.
Pla-Barber, J., and Camps, J. (2012). “Springboarding: a new geographical landscape for European foreign investment in Latin America.” Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 12, núm. 2, p. 519-538.
Pla-Barber, J., Villar, C., and Dasí, À. (2014). “La filial trampolín. Una innovación en la empresa multinacional”. Economía Industrial. 391, p. 105-114.
Prahalad, C. K. and Bhattacharyya, H. (2008): “Twenty hubs and no HQ”. Strategy + Business, 50, p. 1-5.
Rugman, A and Verbeke, A. (2008). “A regional solution to the strategy and structure of multinationals”. European Management Journal, Vol. 26, núm. 5, p. 305-313.
White, R. E., and Poynter, T. A. (1984). “Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada”. Business Quarterly, Vol. 49, núm. 2, p. 59-69.
Yin, R. (1981). “The case study crisis: Some answers”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, núm. 1, p. 58-65.
Young, S., and Tavares, A. T. (2004). “Centralization and autonomy: back to the future”. International Business Review, Vol. 13, núm. 2, p. 215-237.