.png)
IMPLANTES PARA AUMENTAR LAS CAPACIDADES INNATAS: INTEGRADOS VS APOCALÍPTICOS ¿EXISTE UN NUEVO MERCADO?
Article Sidebar
Publicado
Oct 31, 2015
Main Article Content
Resumen
Actualmente se están desarrollando implantes tecnológicos para aumentar capacidades humanas innatas (ITACI) como la memoria o la velocidad de cálculo. Con el objetivo es contrastar su aceptación se ha aplicado un análisis clúster secuencial sobre una muestra de 600 individuos identificando cuatro grupos: integrados, semi-integrados, no integrados y apocalípticos. Los ITACI se consideran interesantes, especialmente los que permiten retrasar el envejecimiento y mejorar la velocidad de pensamiento, aunque existe una gran dispersión frente a su intención de uso. Estos resultados abren un nuevo escenario para la tecnología insideable.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Article Details
Cómo citar
Olarte-Pascual, C., Pelegrin-Borondo, J., & Reinares-Lara, E. (2015). IMPLANTES PARA AUMENTAR LAS CAPACIDADES INNATAS: INTEGRADOS VS APOCALÍPTICOS ¿EXISTE UN NUEVO MERCADO?. UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), (48). Recuperado a partir de https://journals.ucjc.edu/ubr/article/view/1509
Sección
Producción, Innovación y Tecnología
Citas
Adams, J. (2010). “Motivational narratives and assessments of the body after cosmetic surgery”. Qualitative Health Research, 20(6), 755-767. (DOI: http://doi.org/b9p4jz).
Ajzen, I. (1991). “The theory of planned behavior”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. (DOI: http://doi.org/cc3).
Belan, K. (2014). “Six life-changing science-based inventions of the year 2014 by big brands and challengers alike”. Popsop, (http://goo.gl/U0zzww) (17-3-2015).
Bhattacharyya, A. & Kedzior, R. (2012). “Consuming the cyborg”. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 400-403. (http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v40/acr_v40_12579.pdf).
Bhattacherjee, A. & Premkumar, G. (2004). “Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test”. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(2), 229-254. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148634).
Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2009). “The body and technology: Discourses shaping consumer experience and marketing communications of technological products and services”. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 367-371. (http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23629).
Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2011). “Discourses of technology consumption: Ambivalence, fear, and liminality”. Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 287-291. (http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23656).
Cabero-Almenara, J. (1994). “Nuevas tecnologías, comunicación y educación”. Comunicar: Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Comunicación y Educación, (3), 14-25.
Chauhan, N., Warner, J., & Adamson, P.A. (2010). “Adolescent rhinoplasty: Challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes”. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 34(4), 510-516. (DOI: http://doi.org/dq6vt4)
Christie, E., & Bloustien, G. (2010). “I-cyborg: Disability, affect and public pedagogy”. Discourse, 31(4), 483-498. (DOI: http://doi.org/bhrt8b).
Cohen, J. (2013). Memory implants. 10 Breakthrough technolgies 2013. MIT Technology Review. (http://goo.gl/qHv5eJ).
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). “User acceptance of computer-technology - a comparison of 2 theoretical-models”. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. (DOI: http://doi.org/cc7).
Dorneles de Andrade, D. (2010). “On norms and bodies: Findings from field research on cosmetic surgery in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil”. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 74-83. (DOI: http://doi.org/fvq4h7).
Eco, U. (1968). “Apocalípticos e integrados frente a la cultura de masas”. Barcelona: Lumen.
Ferrer, S. (2015). Apuesta por 'startups' genéticas: así es como Google conseguirá que vivas 500 años. El Confidencial. (http://goo.gl/UK9mk2) (10/3/2015).
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research”. Addison-Wesley, MA.
Hernández-Ortega, B & Serrano-Cinca, C. (2009). “¿Qué induce a las empresas a adoptar facturación electrónica? Efecto de las percepciones y del entorno competitivo”. Universia Business Review, 24, 96-121.
Giudici, M.C., Carlson, J.I., Krupa, R.K., Meierbachtol, C.J., & Vanwhy, K.J. (2010). “Submammary pacemakers and ICDs in women: Long-term follow-up and patient satisfaction”. PACE - Pacing and Clinical
Electrophysiology, 33(11), 1373-1375. (DOI: http://doi.org/b45832).
Javo, I.M., & Sørlie, T. (2010). “Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cosmetic surgery among young norwegian women: A population-based study”. Plastic Surgical Nursing, 30(3), 180-186.
Kahle, R.L., & Goff Timmer, S. (1983). “A theory and method for studying values”. In R. L. Kahle (Ed.), Social values and social change. adaptation to life in America (pp. 43-71). New York: Praeger.
Lai, A. (2012). “Cyborg as commodity: Exploring conception of self-identity, body and citizenship within the context of emerging transplant technologies”. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 386-394.
Lawton, G. (2004). “Extreme surgery”. New Scientist, 184(2471), 54-56.
Most, T., Wiesel, A., & Blitzer, T. (2007). “Identity and attitudes towards cochlear implant among deaf and hard of hearing adolescents”. Deafness and Education International, 9(2), 68-82. (DOI: http://doi.org/fvk2gm).
Parkhurst, A. (2012). “Becoming cyborgian: Procrastinating the singularity”. New Bioethics, 18(1), 68-80. (DOI: http://doi.org/4fv).
Rokeach, M. (1973). “The nature of human values”. New York: Free Press.
Rosahl, S.K. (2004). “Vanishing senses—restoration of sensory functions by electronic implants”. Poiesis & Praxis, 2(4), 285-295. (DOI: http://doi.org/bhg8sk).
Schermer, M. (2009). “The mind and the machine. On the conceptual and moral implications of brain-machine interaction”. Nanoethics, 3(3), 217-230. (DOI: http://doi.org/b296bv).
Selinger, E., & Engström, T. (2008). “A moratorium on cyborgs: Computation, cognition, and commerce”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 327-341. (DOI: http://doi.org/b9f9qt).
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. (DOI: http://doi.org/cdv).
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425-478. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540).
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
White, C., & Yu, Y. (2005). “Satisfaction emotions and consumer behavioral intentions”. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(6), 411-420. (DOI: http://doi.org/c58949).
Ajzen, I. (1991). “The theory of planned behavior”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. (DOI: http://doi.org/cc3).
Belan, K. (2014). “Six life-changing science-based inventions of the year 2014 by big brands and challengers alike”. Popsop, (http://goo.gl/U0zzww) (17-3-2015).
Bhattacharyya, A. & Kedzior, R. (2012). “Consuming the cyborg”. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 400-403. (http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v40/acr_v40_12579.pdf).
Bhattacherjee, A. & Premkumar, G. (2004). “Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test”. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(2), 229-254. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148634).
Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2009). “The body and technology: Discourses shaping consumer experience and marketing communications of technological products and services”. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 367-371. (http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23629).
Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Cruz, A. (2011). “Discourses of technology consumption: Ambivalence, fear, and liminality”. Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 287-291. (http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23656).
Cabero-Almenara, J. (1994). “Nuevas tecnologías, comunicación y educación”. Comunicar: Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Comunicación y Educación, (3), 14-25.
Chauhan, N., Warner, J., & Adamson, P.A. (2010). “Adolescent rhinoplasty: Challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes”. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 34(4), 510-516. (DOI: http://doi.org/dq6vt4)
Christie, E., & Bloustien, G. (2010). “I-cyborg: Disability, affect and public pedagogy”. Discourse, 31(4), 483-498. (DOI: http://doi.org/bhrt8b).
Cohen, J. (2013). Memory implants. 10 Breakthrough technolgies 2013. MIT Technology Review. (http://goo.gl/qHv5eJ).
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). “User acceptance of computer-technology - a comparison of 2 theoretical-models”. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. (DOI: http://doi.org/cc7).
Dorneles de Andrade, D. (2010). “On norms and bodies: Findings from field research on cosmetic surgery in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil”. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(35), 74-83. (DOI: http://doi.org/fvq4h7).
Eco, U. (1968). “Apocalípticos e integrados frente a la cultura de masas”. Barcelona: Lumen.
Ferrer, S. (2015). Apuesta por 'startups' genéticas: así es como Google conseguirá que vivas 500 años. El Confidencial. (http://goo.gl/UK9mk2) (10/3/2015).
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research”. Addison-Wesley, MA.
Hernández-Ortega, B & Serrano-Cinca, C. (2009). “¿Qué induce a las empresas a adoptar facturación electrónica? Efecto de las percepciones y del entorno competitivo”. Universia Business Review, 24, 96-121.
Giudici, M.C., Carlson, J.I., Krupa, R.K., Meierbachtol, C.J., & Vanwhy, K.J. (2010). “Submammary pacemakers and ICDs in women: Long-term follow-up and patient satisfaction”. PACE - Pacing and Clinical
Electrophysiology, 33(11), 1373-1375. (DOI: http://doi.org/b45832).
Javo, I.M., & Sørlie, T. (2010). “Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cosmetic surgery among young norwegian women: A population-based study”. Plastic Surgical Nursing, 30(3), 180-186.
Kahle, R.L., & Goff Timmer, S. (1983). “A theory and method for studying values”. In R. L. Kahle (Ed.), Social values and social change. adaptation to life in America (pp. 43-71). New York: Praeger.
Lai, A. (2012). “Cyborg as commodity: Exploring conception of self-identity, body and citizenship within the context of emerging transplant technologies”. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 386-394.
Lawton, G. (2004). “Extreme surgery”. New Scientist, 184(2471), 54-56.
Most, T., Wiesel, A., & Blitzer, T. (2007). “Identity and attitudes towards cochlear implant among deaf and hard of hearing adolescents”. Deafness and Education International, 9(2), 68-82. (DOI: http://doi.org/fvk2gm).
Parkhurst, A. (2012). “Becoming cyborgian: Procrastinating the singularity”. New Bioethics, 18(1), 68-80. (DOI: http://doi.org/4fv).
Rokeach, M. (1973). “The nature of human values”. New York: Free Press.
Rosahl, S.K. (2004). “Vanishing senses—restoration of sensory functions by electronic implants”. Poiesis & Praxis, 2(4), 285-295. (DOI: http://doi.org/bhg8sk).
Schermer, M. (2009). “The mind and the machine. On the conceptual and moral implications of brain-machine interaction”. Nanoethics, 3(3), 217-230. (DOI: http://doi.org/b296bv).
Selinger, E., & Engström, T. (2008). “A moratorium on cyborgs: Computation, cognition, and commerce”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 327-341. (DOI: http://doi.org/b9f9qt).
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. (DOI: http://doi.org/cdv).
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425-478. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540).
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
White, C., & Yu, Y. (2005). “Satisfaction emotions and consumer behavioral intentions”. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(6), 411-420. (DOI: http://doi.org/c58949).