Student motivation in Waldorf foreign language classrooms
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper contributes to the understanding of the concept of student motivation in foreign language learning. Taking into account Waldorf teachers’ optimal classroom experiences (n=18) in foreign language classrooms, this study presents as a conclusion two relationships that emerge in a language learning process: the relationship between the learner and his/her learning environment and the relationship between the learner and his/her school subject. These relationships display seven key aspects namely relatedness/autonomy, contemplation, curiosity, received/offered feedback, language complexity, tolerance towards language, and sensorial activation. These aspects were analysed taking into account a theoretical framework focused on student motivation. This paper encourages teachers and researchers to investigate the Waldorf Approach for teaching foreign languages, not only in Waldorf schools, but also in mainstream public school and multicultural settings that are applying this approach.
Article Details
Section
El sitio https://journals.ucjc.edu/ (en adelante la PLATAFORMA), contiene publicaciones de acceso abierto sostenidas con recursos propios de la Universidad Camilo José Cela, de modo que se mantendrá en todo momento una especial observación de la legislación vigente sobre Derechos de Autor, así como en relación a la privacidad y uso de contenidos. En tal sentido, y como medio diseñado para la transmisión del conocimiento científico sin mayor límite que el impuesto por la Ley, ni la Universidad Camilo José Cela ni ninguna sociedad vinculada a ella ni ningún miembro de su personal asume responsabilidad por las teorías, planteamientos, opiniones e ideas vertidas por los autores/as de los artículos que se publiquen en dicha PLATAFORMA.
La publicación en la PLATAFORMA conlleva la cesión no exclusiva de los derechos de explotación de tales publicaciones, aunque la titularidad de los Derechos morales de Autor corresponderá a los firmantes de los artículos en las condiciones que marque la Ley. No obstante, la UCJC impone ciertas condiciones de publicación cuya violación invalidará automáticamente el artículo aun cuando haya sido publicado, en cuyo caso se retirará de la PLATAFORMA de manera automática y sin previo aviso:
1. Los autores/as se comprometen a enviar artículos originales e inéditos en cualquier formato.
2. Asimismo, se comprometen a no someter a evaluación sus trabajos en otras publicaciones o medios entretanto se encuentren sometidos a examen por parte de la PLATAFORMA. La violación de cualquiera de estas condiciones invalidará automáticamente el artículo aun cuando haya sido publicado, en cuyo caso se retirará de inmediato.
3. La PLATAFORMA es de acceso abierto y sin ánimo de lucro. Por tanto, ni abonará dinero alguno a los autores/as que a ella se dirijan, ni les exigirá pago alguno por publicar.
4. Los autores/as que hayan publicado en la PLATAFORMA podrán disponer de sus trabajos para su inclusión en repositorios, bases de datos u otros medios de difusión similares siempre y cuando en el proceso referencien adecuadamente a la misma.
5. El contenido publicado en Verbeia podrá ser utilizado libremente para propósitos educativos y científicos, siempre y cuando se realice una correcta citación del mismo.
6. Esta revista permite y anima a los autores/as a publicar artículos enviados a la revista en sus sitios web personales o en depósitos institucionales, después de su publicación en esta revista, siempre y cuando proporcionen información bibliográfica que acredite, si procede, su publicación en ella.
La UCJC, en el caso de que se detecte cualquier violación de las condiciones descritas, se reserva el derecho de emprender las pertinentes acciones legales con total independencia de las que pudieran adoptar otros afectados, colateralmente, por cuestiones como el plagio o cualquier suerte de infracciones relacionadas con la legislación vigente.
How to Cite
References
Bandura, A. “On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited.†Journal of Management, 2012, Vol. 38, N. 1, 9–44.
Binimelis, A. J. “Tracking the history of Waldorf education in Iceland.†Master's dissertation, Reykjavik: Háskólaprent, 2014.
Black, A. E. and Deci, E. L. “The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective.†Science Education, 2000, Vol. 84, N. 6, 740–56.
Brater, M., Hemmer-Schanze, C., and Schmelzer, A. Schule ist bunt: Eine interkulturelle Waldorfschule im sozialen Brennpunkt. 1. Aufl., Stuttgart: Verl. Freies Geistesleben, 2007.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row, 1990.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rathunde, K. “The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation.†In Developmental perspectives on motivation, Janis E. Jacobs (Ed.), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1993, 57–97.
Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., Meier, E., Brandner, C., Smeding, A., and Butera, F. “Improving low achievers' academic performance at university by changing the social value of mastery goals.†American Educational Research Journal, 2015, Vol. 52, N. 4, 720–49.
Easton, F. “Educating the whole child.†Theory into Practice, 1997, Vol. 36, N. 2, P. 87–94.
Graham, P. and Johnson, H. “Stimulating curiosity to enhance learning.†Education Science and Psychology, 2011, Vol. 2, N. 19, 24–31.
Grosse, R. “Emil Molt and the Waldorf school at Stuttgart.†Dornach: Anthroposophic News Sheet, 1968, Vol. 36, N. 45.
Jaffke, C. “Foreign languages in Steiner Waldorf educationâ€. Laying the foundation: The first three years of English.†Japan: Hiroshima University, 2005.
Jelinek, D. and Sun, L. “Does Waldorf offer a viable form of science education?†Research Monograph, Sacramento, 2003.
Jensen, E. Teaching with the brain in mind. 2nd ed., Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.
Karoly, P. “Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view.†Annual Review of Psychology, 1993, 44, 23–52.
Kiersch, J. Language teaching in Steiner Waldorf schools: Rudolf Steiner’s concept of an integrated Approach to Language Teaching. Crawley Down: Imprint, 1997.
Köller, O. “Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of the empirical German literature.†In Formative Assessment. Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2005, 265-279.
Litman, J. “Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and linking new information.†Cognition and Emotion, 2005, Vol. 19, N. 6, 793–814.
Litman, J. A. and Jimerson, T. L. “The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation.†Journal of Personality Assessment, 2004, Vol. 82, N. 2, 147–157.
Lutzker, P. The art of foreign language teaching: Improvisation and drama in teacher development and language learning. Tübingen: Francke Verlag, 2007.
Lutzker, P. “Attunement and teaching.†Research on Steiner Education, 2014, Vol. 5, 65–72.
Masters, B. “Distinctive features of Waldorf education and their relevance for or bearing on assessment.†El Guiniguada, 2009, N. 18, 81–100.
Matikainen, T. “Auf den Spuren des Sprachgeistes. Grundlagen und Ideen der waldorfpädagogischen Fremdsprachendidaktik und ihre Verwirklichung in der Schulpraxis (im DaF-Unterricht) an finnischen Waldorfschulen.†Master's dissertation, University of Turku, 2014.
Mitchell, D. Windows into Waldorf: An introduction to Waldorf education. Minneapolis: AWSNA Publications, 2006.
Montenegro, A. “Exploring children’s peer relationships through verbal and non-verbal communication: A qualitative action research focused on Waldorf Pedagogy.†HOW: A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 2007, Vol. 14, N. 1, 59–79.
Nakamura, J. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. “The concept of flow.†In Handbook of positive psychology, C. R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 89–105.
Navascués, M. “Foreign languages in American Waldorf Schools.†Renewal: A Journal for Waldorf Education, 1993, 27–30.
O'Connor, D. and Angus, J. “Give them time - An analysis of school readiness in Ireland's early education system: A Steiner Waldorf Perspective.†Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 2012, Vol. 42, N. 5, 1–10.
Paris, S.G. and Paris, A. H. “Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning.†Educational Psychologist, 2001, Vol. 36, N. 2, 89–101.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., and Kaplan, A. “Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement.†Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007, Vol. 99, N. 1, 83–98.
Petersen, N. “Mother tongue, foreign language, world language: Our relationship to language in an evolving world.†Journal of the Pedagogical Section at the Goetheanum, 2013, Vol. 49, 17–29.
Pintrich, P. R. “An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research.†Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000, Vol. 25, N. 1, 92–104.
Rawson, M. “Foreign languages.†In The educational tasks and content of the Steiner Waldorf curriculum, Martyn Rawson and Tobias Richter (Eds.), Sussex: Steiner Waldorf Schools Fellowship, 2000, 132–134.
Rawson, M. “Democratic leadership in Waldorf schools.†Research on Steiner Education, 2011, Vol. 2, N. 2, 1–15.
Rawson, M. “Sustainable teacher learning in Waldorf education: A socio-cultural perspective.†Research on Steiner Education, 2010, Vol. 1, N. 2, 26–42.
Reeve, J. “A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement.†In Handbook of research on student engagement, S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie (Eds.), Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, 149–72.
Reeve, J. “How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement.†Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013, Vol. 105, N. 3, P. 579–95. doi:10.1037/a0032690.
Reeve, J. and Lee, W. “Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation.†Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014, Vol. 106, N. 2, 527–40.
Röh, C.-P. “Entering deeply into the foreign language and understanding it from within. What does it mean?†(Margot Saar, Trans.) Original in Rundbrief. Journal of the Pedagogical Section at the Goetheanum, 2013, Vol. 47, 9–12.
Ryan, A. M. and Patrick, H. “The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school.†American Educational Research Journal, 2001, Vol. 38, N. 2, 2001, 437–460.
Salanova, M., Rodriguez-Sanchez, A., Schaufeli, W. B., and Cifre, E. “Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups.†The Journal of Psychology, 2014, Vol. 148, N. 4, 435–455.
Schieren, J. “The concept of learning in Waldorf education.†Research on Steiner Education, 2012, Vol. 3, N. 1, 63–74.
Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J. “Social origins of self-regulatory competence.†Educational Psychologist, 1997, N. 32, 195–208.
Shernoff, D. J. “Engagement and positive youth development: Creating optimal learning environments.†In The APA Educational Psychology Handbook, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan (Eds.), Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2012, 195–220.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., and Shernoff, E. S. “Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.†School Psychology Quarterly, 2003, Vol. 18, 158–76.
Sobo, E. J. “This is not head-to-head educationâ€: Whole child development in a Waldorf school.†Proceedings of Learning in and out of School: Education across the Globe. 22 May 2012, Indiana: Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
Steiner, R. Practical advice to teachers. (Johanna Collis, Trans.). Great Barrington, MA: Anthroposophic Press, (Original work published 1919), 2000.
Steinmann, L. “Foreign language teaching and the art of educating (Trans. Ingrid Schutz).†Journal of the Pedagogical Section at the Goetheanum, 2012, Vol. 46, 10–16.
Tardy, C. M. and Snyder, B. “That’s why I do it: Flow and EFL teachers’ practices.†ELT Journal, 2004, Vol. 58, N. 2, 118–128.
Tchannen-Moran, M. and Woolfolk-Hoy, A. “Capturing an elusive construct.†Teaching and Teacher Education, 2001, Vol. 17, 783–805.
Templeton, A. Teaching English to teens and preteens: A guide for language teachers with techniques and materials for grades 4-9 (2nd ed.). Kálvária: Hevesim, 2010.
Tsai, Y., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., and Ryan, R. M. “What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects.†Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008, Vol. 100, N. 2, 460–72.
Urdan, T. and Schoenfelder, E. “Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs.†Journal of School Psychology, 2006, Vol. 44, N. 5, 331–49.
Von Winterfeldt, D. “Why grammar?†Teaching English to teens and preteens: A guide for language teachers with techniques and materials for grades 4-9 (2nd ed.), Alec Templeton (Ed.), Kálvária: Hevesim, 2010, 138–144.
Wiechert, C. “Foreign language teaching and the art of educating.†Journal for Waldorf Education, 2013, Vol. 15, N. 1, 22–25.
Zimmer, R. Handbuch Sprachförderung durch Bewegung. Freiburg: Herder, 2010.
Zimmerman, B. J. “Self-efficacy: An essential motive to Learn.†Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000, Vol. 25, N. 1, 82–91.