GREEN PATENTS IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR: THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESSES’ RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES

Main Article Content

Sabina Scarpellini
Pilar Portillo-Tarragona
Luz María Marín-vinuesa
José M. Moneva

Abstract

This paper, which is of interest to practitioners, will analyse companies in the manufacturing sector that hold Spanish and European environmental patents, linking the registered green patents with the economic and financial characteristics of the companies. Specifically, the relationship between green patents and the collaboration of companies with research and development (R&D) centres is analysed. The results of surveying an ad-hoc database comprising 1606 Spanish companies indicate that the ways in which the companies collaborate with R&D organisations can shed light on green patent holdings in the Spanish manufacturing companies.Moreover, the authors find that financial performance, age, and size are all significant factors in the development of green patents. 

Article Details

Section

Artículos

Author Biographies

Sabina Scarpellini, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departamento de Contabilidad y Finanzas  y CIRCE Research Institute

Pilar Portillo-Tarragona, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departamento de Contabilidad y Finanzas

Luz María Marín-vinuesa, Univesidad de la Rioja

Departamento de Economía y Empresa

José M. Moneva, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departmaneto de Contabilidad y Finanzas. 

Decano de la Facultad de Economía y Empresa de la Univ. de Zaragoza

How to Cite

GREEN PATENTS IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR: THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESSES’ RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES. (2017). UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), 56. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N4.01

References

Aragon-Correa, J.A., Leyva-de la Hiz, D.I., 2016. The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 25, 421–434. doi:10.1002/bse.1885

Barge-Gil, A., López, A., 2014. R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development. Res. Policy 43, 1634–1648. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.017

Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., García-Marco, T., 2013. You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Res. Policy 42, 1239–1250. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012

Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., Sáez-Martínez, F.J., 2015. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 17, 6–23. doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060

Doran, J., Ryan, G., 2012. Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 15, 421–441. doi:10.1108/14601060410515646

European Commission, 2016. Flash Eurobarometer 441 marketplaces and search engines by SMEs Fieldwork April 2016 June 2016 Survey requested by the European Commission , Flash Eurobarometer 439 Report The use of online marketplaces and search engines by SMEs.

González-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G., Ferreira, L.M., Gonzalez-Zapatero, C., 2016. The effect of green purchasing on purchasing performance: the moderating role played by long-term relationships and strategic integration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31, 312–324. doi:10.1108/JBIM-09-2014-0188

Halila, F., Rundquist, J., 2011. The development and market success of eco-innovations: A comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 14, 278–302. doi:10.1108/14601061111148807

Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H., 2001. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industriy, 1979-1995. J. Econ. 32, 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400

Henriques, I., Sharma, S., 2005. Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 14, 384–398. doi:10.1002/bse.456

Horbach, J., 2016. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 19. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005

Jensen, M., Roy, A., 2008. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Manag. J. 51, 495–516. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625985

Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D., 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1

Keupp, M.M., Palmié, M., Gassmann, O., 2012. The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, 367–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x

Kobayashi, H., Kato, M., Maezawa, Y., Sano, K., 2011. An R&D management framework for eco-technology. Sustainability 3, 1282–1301. doi:10.3390/su3081282

Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., Groen, A.J., 2010. The RBV: a Review and Assessment of its Critiques. J. Manage. 36, 349–372. doi:10.1177/0149206309350775

Lee, K.H., Min, B., 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114

Leitner, A., Wehrmeyer, W., France, C., 2010. Management Research Review The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 33, 1022–1041.

Machiba, T., 2010. Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: Development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 7, 357–370. doi:10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y

Marin, G., 2014. Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Res. Policy 43, 301–317. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.015

Mortazavi Ravari, S.S., Mehrabanfar, E., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., 2016. Framework for assessing technological innovation capability in research and technology organizations. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 825–847. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1253607

OECD, 2015. Environment at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2013-en

OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3a. ed. OECD publishing, Paris.

Paraschiv, D.M., Voicu-Dorobantu, R., Langa(Olaru), C., Laura Nemoianu, E., 2012. New models in support of the eco-innovative capacity of companies - A theoretical approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 5.

Peiró-Signes, Á., Segarra-Oña, M. del V., Miret-Pastor, L., Verma, R., 2011. Eco-innovation attitude and industry’s technological level - an important key for promoting efficient vertical policies. Environ. Eng. Manag. J.

Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73, 120–134.

Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Peleckienė, V., Peleckis, K., 2016. Values, environmental concern and economic concern as predictors of enterprise environmental responsiveness. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 685–700. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1202315

Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance - Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034

Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32, 319–332. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3

Revell, A., Rutherfoord, R., 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 12, 26–35. doi:10.1002/bse.347

Scarpellini, S., Aranda, A., Aranda, J., Llera, E., Marco, M., 2012. R&D and eco-innovation: Opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 14, 1047–1058. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0514-1

Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., Portillo-Tarragona, P., 2016. The “economic-finance interface” for eco-innovation projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1012–1025. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005

Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., Günther, J., 2012. What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? - Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation 32, 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004

Segarra-Ona, M., Peiro-Signes, A., Paya-Martinez, A., 2014. Factors Influencing Automobile Firms’ Eco-Innovation Orientation. Emj-Engineering Manag. J. 26. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432002

Segarra-Oña, M.-V., Peiró-Signes, Á., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., Vargas-Vargas, M., 2014. Service vs. manufacturing: how to address more effectively eco-innovation public policies by disentangling the different characteristics of industries. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 27. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.863705

Teirlinck, P., Spithoven, A., 2013. Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in business services. R&D Manag. 43, 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00701.x

Tessitore, S., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., 2010. Eco-innovation and economic performance in industrial clusters: Evidence from Italy. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 42, 1487–1493.

Valero-Gil, J., Scarpellini, S., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., 2017. Environment and innovation in spanish business : bridging the gap between academics and practitioners. Universia Bus. Rev. 54, 90–109. doi:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N2.03

van Dongen, P., Winnink, J., Tijssen, R., 2014. Academic inventions and patents in the Netherlands: A case study on business sector exploitation. World Pat. Inf. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2014.03.002

Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7

Wagner, M., 2007. On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 36, 1587–1602. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004