PATENTES VERDES EN EL SECTOR MANUFACTURERO: EL IMPACTO DE LOS RECURSOS Y LAS CAPACIDADES DE LAS EMPRESAS

Main Article Content

Sabina Scarpellini
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-5352
Pilar Portillo-Tarragona
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-4618
Luz María Marín-vinuesa
José M. Moneva
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-8042

Resumen

Este artículo proporciona a los profesionales un análisis de empresas con patentes verdes del sector manufacturero, relacionando las características económico-financieras de las empresas con el número de sus patentes verdes nacionales y Europeas. En particular se analiza la relación entre la colaboración con centros de I+D y la posesión de patentes verdes. Los resultados, obtenido a través de una base de datos ad hoc de 1606 empresas españolas, indican que la capacidad colaborativa para la investigación y el desarrollo (I+D) proporciona una útil explicación de la tenencia de patentes verdes en las empresas manufactureras españolas. Además, la performance financiera de las empresas, su antigüedad y tamaño, se consideran relevantes para el desarrollo de patentes verdes.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Article Details

Cómo citar
Scarpellini, S., Portillo-Tarragona, P., Marín-vinuesa, L., & Moneva, J. (2017). PATENTES VERDES EN EL SECTOR MANUFACTURERO: EL IMPACTO DE LOS RECURSOS Y LAS CAPACIDADES DE LAS EMPRESAS. UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), (56). https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N4.01
Sección
Artículos
Biografía del autor/a

Sabina Scarpellini, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departamento de Contabilidad y FinanzasInstituto de Investigación CIRCECoordinadora Grupo de Investigación en Socioeconomía

Pilar Portillo-Tarragona, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departamento de Contabilidad y Finanzas

Luz María Marín-vinuesa, Universidad de La Rioja

Departamento de Economía y Empresa

José M. Moneva, Universidad de Zaragoza

Departmaneto de Contabilidad y Finanzas. Decano de la Facultad de Economía y Empresa de la Univ. de Zaragoza

Citas

Aragon-Correa, J.A., Leyva-de la Hiz, D.I., 2016. The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 25, 421–434. doi:10.1002/bse.1885
Barge-Gil, A., López, A., 2014. R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development. Res. Policy 43, 1634–1648. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.017
Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., García-Marco, T., 2013. You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Res. Policy 42, 1239–1250. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., Sáez-Martínez, F.J., 2015. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 17, 6–23. doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060
Doran, J., Ryan, G., 2012. Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 15, 421–441. doi:10.1108/14601060410515646
European Commission, 2016. Flash Eurobarometer 441 marketplaces and search engines by SMEs Fieldwork April 2016 June 2016 Survey requested by the European Commission , Flash Eurobarometer 439 Report The use of online marketplaces and search engines by SMEs.
González-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G., Ferreira, L.M., Gonzalez-Zapatero, C., 2016. The effect of green purchasing on purchasing performance: the moderating role played by long-term relationships and strategic integration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31, 312–324. doi:10.1108/JBIM-09-2014-0188
Halila, F., Rundquist, J., 2011. The development and market success of eco-innovations: A comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 14, 278–302. doi:10.1108/14601061111148807
Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H., 2001. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industriy, 1979-1995. J. Econ. 32, 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400
Henriques, I., Sharma, S., 2005. Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 14, 384–398. doi:10.1002/bse.456
Horbach, J., 2016. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 19. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005
Jensen, M., Roy, A., 2008. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Manag. J. 51, 495–516. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625985
Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D., 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
Keupp, M.M., Palmié, M., Gassmann, O., 2012. The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, 367–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x
Kobayashi, H., Kato, M., Maezawa, Y., Sano, K., 2011. An R&D management framework for eco-technology. Sustainability 3, 1282–1301. doi:10.3390/su3081282
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., Groen, A.J., 2010. The RBV: a Review and Assessment of its Critiques. J. Manage. 36, 349–372. doi:10.1177/0149206309350775
Lee, K.H., Min, B., 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
Leitner, A., Wehrmeyer, W., France, C., 2010. Management Research Review The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 33, 1022–1041.
Machiba, T., 2010. Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: Development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 7, 357–370. doi:10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y
Marin, G., 2014. Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Res. Policy 43, 301–317. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.015
Mortazavi Ravari, S.S., Mehrabanfar, E., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., 2016. Framework for assessing technological innovation capability in research and technology organizations. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 825–847. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1253607
OECD, 2015. Environment at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2013-en
OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3a. ed. OECD publishing, Paris.
Paraschiv, D.M., Voicu-Dorobantu, R., Langa(Olaru), C., Laura Nemoianu, E., 2012. New models in support of the eco-innovative capacity of companies - A theoretical approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 5.
Peiró-Signes, Á., Segarra-Oña, M. del V., Miret-Pastor, L., Verma, R., 2011. Eco-innovation attitude and industry’s technological level - an important key for promoting efficient vertical policies. Environ. Eng. Manag. J.
Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73, 120–134.
Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Peleckienė, V., Peleckis, K., 2016. Values, environmental concern and economic concern as predictors of enterprise environmental responsiveness. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 685–700. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1202315
Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance - Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034
Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32, 319–332. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
Revell, A., Rutherfoord, R., 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 12, 26–35. doi:10.1002/bse.347
Scarpellini, S., Aranda, A., Aranda, J., Llera, E., Marco, M., 2012. R&D and eco-innovation: Opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 14, 1047–1058. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0514-1
Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., Portillo-Tarragona, P., 2016. The “economic-finance interface” for eco-innovation projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1012–1025. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005
Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., Günther, J., 2012. What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? - Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation 32, 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004
Segarra-Ona, M., Peiro-Signes, A., Paya-Martinez, A., 2014. Factors Influencing Automobile Firms’ Eco-Innovation Orientation. Emj-Engineering Manag. J. 26. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432002
Segarra-Oña, M.-V., Peiró-Signes, Á., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., Vargas-Vargas, M., 2014. Service vs. manufacturing: how to address more effectively eco-innovation public policies by disentangling the different characteristics of industries. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 27. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.863705
Teirlinck, P., Spithoven, A., 2013. Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in business services. R&D Manag. 43, 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00701.x
Tessitore, S., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., 2010. Eco-innovation and economic performance in industrial clusters: Evidence from Italy. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 42, 1487–1493.
Valero-Gil, J., Scarpellini, S., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., 2017. Environment and innovation in spanish business : bridging the gap between academics and practitioners. Universia Bus. Rev. 54, 90–109. doi:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N2.03
van Dongen, P., Winnink, J., Tijssen, R., 2014. Academic inventions and patents in the Netherlands: A case study on business sector exploitation. World Pat. Inf. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2014.03.002
Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7
Wagner, M., 2007. On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 36, 1587–1602. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004