.png)
La Lógica Tripartita de la Construcción de un País Líder en Educación: Un Estudio Comparativo de los Modelos Europeos
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este estudio explora los fundamentos para la construcción de un país líder en educación mediante un análisis comparativo de nueve casos europeos: Finlandia, Suecia, Noruega, Dinamarca, el Reino Unido, Alemania, Francia, Suiza y los Países Bajos. A través de un marco cualitativo de estudios de caso múltiples, la investigación identifica tres dimensiones centrales: equidad, calidad y alineación estratégica. Los sistemas europeos promueven la equidad mediante legislaciones inclusivas, asignación focalizada de recursos y servicios extracurriculares; garantizan la calidad a través de estructuras diversificadas, altos estándares en la formación docente y evaluaciones rigurosas; y logran la alineación estratégica fomentando talentos innovadores y STEM para apoyar el desarrollo nacional. A pesar de la diversidad institucional, estos países presentan coherencia y resiliencia en sus políticas, ofreciendo lecciones valiosas para la reforma educativa global. Los hallazgos sugieren que combinar principios universales con prácticas localizadas es esencial para los países que aspiran a construir sistemas educativos equitativos, de alta calidad y orientados a la innovación.
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Cómo citar
Referencias
[1]Boldt, S., Devine, B., Mac Devitt, D. and Morgan, M. (1998). Educational Disadvantage and Early School-leaving Discussion Papers. Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.
[2]Cao, D. M. (2008). Bologna-Prozess:Wichtiges Rahmenprogramm für die Hochschulreform der europlischen Staaten. Deutschland-Studien, (03): 66-71+80.
[3]Costello, E., Girme, P., McKnight, M., Brown, M., McLoughlin, E., & Kaya, S. (2020). Government Responses to the Challenge of STEM Education: Case Studies from Europe. ATS STEM Report.
[4]Deissinger, T. & Gonon, P. (2016). Stakeholders in the German and Swiss vocational educational and training system: Their role in innovating apprenticeships against the background of academisation, Education and Training, 58(6): 568-577.
[5]European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2023). Country System Mapping Country Report: Finland. Odense, Denmark.
[6]European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2023). Country System Mapping Country Report: France. Odense, Denmark.
[7]Finland Ministry of Education and Culture. (2023). Policies for the digitalisation of education and training until 2027. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/165248.
[8]Finish National Agency for Education. (2014). Core Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary (Basic) Education. https://www.oph.fi/en/education-and-qualifications/national-core-curriculum-primary-and-lower-secondary-basic-education
[9]Jin, Y. L. & Li, H. M. (2017). On the Cultivation of Tiptop Innovative Talents and Its Experience and Enlightenment in the British Research-intensive Universities. Journal of Higher Education, 38(6): 98-104.
[10]Jesús M., María M., Javier M. V. (2019). Supranational and Comparative Study of the Preservice Training Teachers in the European Union. Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 23(03).
[11]Kamil ÖZERK (2013). The Norwegian Educational System, the Linguistic Diversity in the Country and the Education of Different Minority Groups, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 43-60.
[12]Li, M. Z. & Sun Y. Y. (2024). The Selection and Cultivation of Top-Notch Innovative Talents in Powerful Countries in the World: Multiple Models and China’s Choice. Educational Research, 45(4): 40-51.
[13]Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher Professional Development in Finland: Towards a More Holistic Approach. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 278-294.
[14]OECD. (2012). Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
[15]OECD. (2019). Balancing School Choice and Equity: An International Perspective Based on PISA, Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing PISA.
[16]Ofsted. (2019). The Education Inspection Framework. https://www.gov. uk/government/publications/education-inspection-framework.pdf.
[17]Pasi Sahlberg. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland, Teachers College Press, 25-40.
[18]Tegtmejer, T. (2022). The Price for Inclusion: Financial/Educational Dilemmas in the Inclusive School System in Denmark. Educ. Sci, 12, 832.
[19]The Office for Standards in Education. (2015). Children’s Services and Skills. The common inspection framework: education, skills and early years. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/common-inspection-framework-education-skill-s-and-early-years-from-september-2015.
[20]Tirri Kirsi. (2014). The Last 40 Years in Finnish Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 600-609.
[21]Tormey, R. (2010). The Silent Politics of Educational Disadvantage and the National Anti-Poverty Strategy. Irish Educational Studies, 29(2), 190-198.
[22]U.K. Department for Education. (2014). Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) Statutory Framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2.
[23]U.K. Department for Education. (2018). Free School Meals: Guidance for Schools and Local Authorities. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/free-school-meals-guidance-for-schools-and-local-authorities.
[24]U.K. Government. (2016). National Teaching Service: for Teachers and Middle Leaders. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-teaching-service-for-teachers-and-middle-leaders-schools-and-local-authorities.
[25]Zhang, W. & Zhou, H. Y. (2022). Building a Powerful Country in Education in China: Index and Orientation. Educational Research, 43 (01): 146-159.