.png)
LA INNOVACIÓN ABIERTA Y LA COMPARACIÓN ENTRE LAS STARTUPS Y LAS EMPRESAS ESTABLECIDAD EN ESPAÑA
Article Sidebar
Publicado
Jul 31, 2017
Main Article Content
Resumen
Este estudio compara la estrategia de innovación abierta entre startups y empresas establecidas por un periodo de diez años (2004-2013). Usando una muestra española de startups y empresas establecidas, encontramos que difieren considerablemente, y ello tiene implicaciones para la dirección de empresas. Las empresas establecidas y las startups se diferencian en términos de su uso de las actividades de cooperación externas como fuente de innovación. La falta de recursos financieros y humanos de las startups les lleva a abrir sus fronteras más que las empresas establecidas, y las startups se benefician de ser flexibles porque no han implementado rutinas todavía. Esto impulsa el resultado de innovación de las startups.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Article Details
Cómo citar
Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., & Beukel, K. (2017). LA INNOVACIÓN ABIERTA Y LA COMPARACIÓN ENTRE LAS STARTUPS Y LAS EMPRESAS ESTABLECIDAD EN ESPAÑA. UCJC Business and Society Review (formerly Known As Universia Business Review), (55). https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01
Sección
Producción, Innovación y Tecnología
Citas
Acciona. (2015). Open innovation to solve social challenges. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.acciona.com/pressroom/news/2015/october/open-innovation-solve-social-challenges/
Adelino, M., Ma, S., & Robinson, D. T. (2014). Firm Age, Investment Opportunities, and Job Creation (Working Paper No. 19845). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19845
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (NBER Chapters) (pp. 609–626). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/nbrnberch/2144.htm
Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715
Boyer, T., & Blazy, R. (2013). Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9522-8
Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open Innovation: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5504085
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007
Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–76.
Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006). In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35(8), 1166–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.002
Criscuolo, P., Nicolaou, N., & Salter, A. (2012). The elixir (or burden) of youth? Exploring differences in innovation between start-ups and established firms. Research Policy, 41(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.001
Eftekhari, N., & Bogers, M. (2015). Open for Entrepreneurship: How Open Innovation Can Foster New Venture Creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12136
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.
Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026180418357
Emiliejessula. (2016, November 30). Amadeus’s Open Innovation Strategy and Collaboration with Startups. Retrieved April 27, 2017, from http://www.innovation-prime.com/shaping-the-future-of-travel-amadeus-and-open-innovation/
Everis. (2017, March 30). Two Spanish companies will compete in the NTT DATA start-up final in Tokyo. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.everis.com/united-kingdom/en/news/newsroom/two-spanish-companies-will-compete-ntt-data-start-final-tokyo
FECYT, & INE. (2016). Panel de Innovación Tecnológica (PITEC).
Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x
Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156
Hyytinen, A., Pajarinen, M., & Rouvinen, P. (2015). Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.10.001
INE. (2016). Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (National Statistics Institute). Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft37%2Fp204&file=inebase&L=0
Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When Does Lack of Resources Make New Firms Innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803924
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
Nesta, Founders Intelligence, & Startup Europe Partnership. (2015). Winning together: a guide to successful corporate-startup collaborations. United Kingdom: Nesta.
Neyens, I., Faems, D., & Sels, L. (2010). The impact of continuous and discontinuous alliance strategies on startup innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035982
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Opinno. (2016, February 5). Endesa Energy Challenges incubates the future of energy [Text]. Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://www.opinno.com/en/content/endesa-energy-challenges-incubates-future-energy?language=es
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. Handbook of Organizations, 44(2), 142–193.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-K
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Wallin, M. W., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.010
Adelino, M., Ma, S., & Robinson, D. T. (2014). Firm Age, Investment Opportunities, and Job Creation (Working Paper No. 19845). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19845
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (NBER Chapters) (pp. 609–626). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/nbrnberch/2144.htm
Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715
Boyer, T., & Blazy, R. (2013). Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9522-8
Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open Innovation: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5504085
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007
Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–76.
Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006). In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35(8), 1166–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.002
Criscuolo, P., Nicolaou, N., & Salter, A. (2012). The elixir (or burden) of youth? Exploring differences in innovation between start-ups and established firms. Research Policy, 41(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.001
Eftekhari, N., & Bogers, M. (2015). Open for Entrepreneurship: How Open Innovation Can Foster New Venture Creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12136
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.
Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026180418357
Emiliejessula. (2016, November 30). Amadeus’s Open Innovation Strategy and Collaboration with Startups. Retrieved April 27, 2017, from http://www.innovation-prime.com/shaping-the-future-of-travel-amadeus-and-open-innovation/
Everis. (2017, March 30). Two Spanish companies will compete in the NTT DATA start-up final in Tokyo. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.everis.com/united-kingdom/en/news/newsroom/two-spanish-companies-will-compete-ntt-data-start-final-tokyo
FECYT, & INE. (2016). Panel de Innovación Tecnológica (PITEC).
Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x
Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156
Hyytinen, A., Pajarinen, M., & Rouvinen, P. (2015). Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.10.001
INE. (2016). Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (National Statistics Institute). Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft37%2Fp204&file=inebase&L=0
Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When Does Lack of Resources Make New Firms Innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803924
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
Nesta, Founders Intelligence, & Startup Europe Partnership. (2015). Winning together: a guide to successful corporate-startup collaborations. United Kingdom: Nesta.
Neyens, I., Faems, D., & Sels, L. (2010). The impact of continuous and discontinuous alliance strategies on startup innovation performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035982
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Opinno. (2016, February 5). Endesa Energy Challenges incubates the future of energy [Text]. Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://www.opinno.com/en/content/endesa-energy-challenges-incubates-future-energy?language=es
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. Handbook of Organizations, 44(2), 142–193.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-K
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Wallin, M. W., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.010